PhotobucketPhotobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket
Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket
v

12 September 2007

Rome Didn't Fall in a Day...




First let me say be sure not to miss the post before this one - the photos are too funny.


I will confess that Joel and I LOVE the HBO series; "Rome." The reason I say "confess" is that the show can be rather in your face...leaving little to the imagination, not holding back when portraying the pagan culture that was (quite often I have to look away, we have even fast forwarded it!!).
I have, for years been fascinated with ancient Rome and it's similarities to our country today. Civilized society meets absolute perversion. As a young person in my early twenties I would tell my friends, "What makes us think we can keep going on like this...look at Rome!" They just looked at me like I was crazy.

There are, as you know popular beliefs that I don't subscribe to...I don't believe Africa should be supplied with safe sex lessons and condoms (any more than today's teens should), I don't believe you and I are the cause of Global Warming and I don't believe in "over-population." I was then of course pleased to read this article by Chuck Colson. I found it at am 560's website- www.560wind.com. I thought you might enjoy it...I appreciate you taking two minutes to read it and your comments.

"Every time you turn around, a presidential candidate whips out his Bible—or a position paper—to let us know how faithful he or she is. Senator John Edwards (D-N.C.) says God "would be happy with the fact that" he's focused on people without health care. Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) says we should "discuss religion . . . in the positive sense of what it tells us about our obligations towards one another." Republicans, also, are quick to point out how faith informs their policies.

Clearly, the candidates are appealing to America's religious voters—and they are smart to do so. As one social scientist recently noted, they are going to need religious voters for the long term—because Christians are having far more children than their secular neighbors.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, social scientist Arthur Brooks notes that if you pick 100 adults out of the population who attend their houses of worship nearly every week, they would have 223 children among them. But among 100 people who attend religious services less than once a year—or never—you would find 158 kids. That's a 41 percent fertility gap between religious and secular people.

Even worse—if you are a secularist—religious people who identify themselves as politically "conservative" or "very conservative" are having, on average, an astonishing 78 percent more kids than secular liberals, Brooks writes.

This is significant, because kids tend to grow up to worship the way their parents do. In a generation or two, we are going to have a bumper crop of conservative citizens. Candidates who appeal to Christians will win more elections simply because of demographics.

This is not the first time in history we have seen the demographic power of the Church. Take, for example, ancient Rome.

In his book The Rise of Christianity, Rodney Stark describes ways in which religious belief affected population growth and decline. Pagans believed in abortion; Christians forbade it. Christianity also prohibited infanticide. But as for pagans, Stark told Touchstone magazine: "We've unearthed sewers clogged with the bones of newborn girls." So, "Christians didn't have the enormous shortage of women that plagued the rest of the empire."

And pagan husbands engaged in adultery, polygamy, and divorce, but Christianity forbade these things. So, Christian marriages tended to be more loving, more faithful, and more open to children.

We see parallels today between the modern West and ancient Rome. The low pagan fertility rate meant that Rome needed to import workers—and soldiers—from the farthest reaches of the empire and beyond. Rome lost its social cohesion. So, Rome fell. The Christian Church survived because believers had been multiplying. And what is going to cause Christianity to recover in the modern West may be precisely the same phenomenon.

For the last half century, Western industrialized nations, fearing overpopulation and despoiling the planet, have made slowing population growth one of their top priorities. So now we are in the middle of what one observer calls a "global baby bust"—except, that is, among devout Christian families, those who take seriously the biblical mandate to "be fruitful and multiply." It shows that when Christians live out the biblical worldview, we not only survive, we thrive.

Chuck Colson is the Chairman and Founder of BreakPoint and of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

8 comments:

HomemakerAng said...

sounds like we are heading to rome possible here in sweet USA... God bless it, we need to start blessing Him though and it could turn around, until then I am not so sure... Great post. we study Rome in our homeschool here pretty quick, about 2 weeks, of course I will take out some parts for the kiddies...

to answer your questions, I dont know if you check back or not, I forget to do that on blogs :):

at this point in my life STERILE HOSPITALS have been my #1 choice for births! This one will be the same... I would love to birth at home but I fell that I need a back up plan just in case... I have 4 littles ones already to be responsible for... I am not getting any younger!

I did have 3 out of 4 natural childbirths... I am trying natural again but 10 and just shy of 11 #ers are tricky... 23.5 inches!!!

We only have 3.5 acres... I alwasy wish for more, but as you can see you get alot of bang for your buck with just that! Next summer, Lord willing, I want to be able to can and freeze the whole garden so we can have our fresh organic stuff on hand from the freezer etc. all winter. Plus we do our own meats so we have no antibiotics, nitrates, etc. Hoping to do some cows. have our own chickies...

Maybe a goat for goats milk and cheese someday, maybe...

I am not a gourmet cook as yourself but would love some lessons in that!

any time you are up here stop in. xoxox
you might want to call first, no idea what I might be up to!
;0)

Julee Ann said...

It figures, you would start posting like a madwoman, right when I don't have a second to read. Aidan's pics below, belong in the Saturday Evening Post. I didn't read this post yet--I just know I want to and I can't right now. Dad blast it.
I'll be back--save me a seat.

blessings said...

Great post! It's good to see a blogger taking a true stand. Blessings... Polly

Farmgirl Cyn said...

I LOVE my big family, in spite of the difficulties! I pray my children all serve the God of their parents. For what does it profit a man if he gain the whole world and lose his family?

Victoria said...

I go back and forth between wanting to see God strike it all down and conquer... and then praying so fervently that He would be glorified by each of us doing just our little part to obey Him. Keep up the good work with them little ones, Farmgirl. I'm right behind you!

V.

Faith said...

Great post Ang. When do we get to hear about your vacation???

Owen said...

I love the subjunctive tense of the good Senator Edwards' comment.

How revealing is that?

"God would be so pleased..."

LOL!!

Yes, indeed sir. Would that there were a Living, Almighty, Covanental God with whom each and every one of us interfaces with in our every cognition (let alone action), then yes, assuredly, He would be so pleased.

If one is yet in the dark as to how to interpret the good Senator's syntax, follow. He can be understood as saying:

"If that God that so many conservatives believe exists actually did exist, then He'd be so pleased with me. Ergo, they should be pleased with me to... since He would, if He existed."

Nice.

PS - I'm back. New footage of Master Pousse Esq. and myself at:
Nics-life-alone.blogspot.com

-Nicholas.

Julee Ann said...

In certain cases, I've seen children have even a stronger sense of faith, worship, and getting back to simpler basics (like having more babies), than their parents.
What will "they" do with those demographics?
I say, bring on the grandchildren! Or grand neices/nephews, in my case.

I seriously think you should send those pics below to somewhere.

Been mowing long?